We are currently rolling out Opigno LMS for a rather large internal education and compliance system. Several of our lessons are SCORM packages, published as version 1.2. As 1.2 is still regarded as the industry standard, should there not be a push to adopt this compatibility? Direct from scorm.com: "Recommendation: SCORM 1.2 was VERY widely adopted and is still the industry workhorse. Every e-learning vendor should make their products compatible with SCORM 1.2. SCORM 1.2 will be around for a long time to come." The top players in the industry, Edmodo, Blackboard, and Moodle, are all 1.2 compliant. In order to compete in this market, it seems obvious that a product must have this requirement at a minimum. The several forum posts with users questioning 1.2 compliance backs up this data. Understanding that Tin Can may be the next-gen platform, we need to recognize the market, and provide the majority with a base functionality.
We know that.
We know that.
You know, we have a lot of points in our development roadmap, all of them are important, and we try to deal with all of them as best as we can.
It's not very complicated to convert a Scorm 1.2 package to Scorm 2004 (there are some connectors) that why we did not attribute the highest priority to Scorm 1.2 compliance.
But it will be done soon or later, that's for sure !